word craft


Thoughts on Book Reviews

Book ReviewsCon­sid­er: what is the pur­pose of a book review? Is it sim­ply to reg­is­ter a reader’s sub­jec­tive response? Is it to eval­u­ate the writ­ing with­in the broad­er con­text of lit­er­a­ture? Or is it the reviewer’s task to deter­mine what the writer want­ed to achieve, and eval­u­ate if those goals have been achieved?

Are reviews meant to mon­i­tor writ­ing for oth­er read­ers? For the most part, review­ers of books for chil­dren are not children.

A good review doesn’t just make the author feel good about his/her work, it gives the writer con­fi­dence that their own judge­ment about their writ­ing is justified.

Sim­i­lar­ly, a dis­mis­sive review, or a per­son­al­ly neg­a­tive review doesn’t just make the author feel bad, it under­mines their self-con­fi­dence (see above).

(Consider—whatever your pro­fes­sion or job might be—how, at the end of a year’s work—or two—if you received a one-para­graph neg­a­tive, dis­mis­sive eval­u­a­tion of your work. How would you feel?)

 A good review can sure­ly increase inter­est in the work, and lead to greater sales. A clus­ter of good reviews can bring atten­tion to that work and lead to awards and recognition.

A bad review can choke off all of those things.

A well writ­ten crit­i­cal review can teach the writer something—something the author can absorb and use. In the same way even praise for aspects of the writ­ing can teach the writer what he/she is doing that res­onates with readers.

What I have learned is that if a vari­ety of reviews all say the same thing (neg­a­tive­ly or pos­i­tive­ly) it prob­a­bly is an accu­rate evaluation.

RagweedWhen my Rag­weed (book one in the Pop­py series) was pub­lished a num­ber of years ago, it received good reviews but there was crit­i­cism for its use of exces­sive slang. I decid­ed that was valid. So, recent­ly, when my pub­lish­er told me they were going to reis­sue the book, I asked if I could rewrite it.  They said yes.  I was able to go through the book and cut much of that annoy­ing slang.  That doesn’t hap­pen very often but I was delight­ed that I could do so. Thanks to the crit­i­cism, Rag­weed is now a bet­ter book.

There is a skill in writ­ing reviews just as there is a skill need­ed for any kind of writ­ing. There are well writ­ten reviews and poor­ly writ­ten ones. Should read­ers of reviews note that? Should review writ­ing be taught? Should crit­i­cism be reviewed? From what I have observed, crit­ics get very defen­sive if their crit­i­cism is criticized.

When all is said and done the most impor­tant crit­ic of an author is the author. Self-crit­i­cism is a con­stant and vital com­po­nent of any writing.

Does any­one want to review what I have said here? Feel free to criticize.

2 thoughts on “Thoughts on Book Reviews”

  1. I appre­ci­ate your words! I think con­struc­tive feed­back is always wel­come. If cri­tique becomes crit­i­cism, with­out oppor­tu­ni­ty to revise, it’s not gen­er­al­ly productive.

  2. I hon­est­ly don’t think reviews are for the writ­ers. They’re by read­ers for oth­er read­ers. As a read­er, I use them to gauge if I might want to begin read­ing a book. As a writer, I try not to read them. 😉


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts