Avi

word craft

blog

Do Writers Listen to Critics?

When you are a pub­lic (i.e., pub­lished) author you are going to get pub­lic (pub­lished) crit­i­cism. In all the years of my pub­lish­ing I have nev­er got­ten uni­ver­sal pos­i­tive respons­es to any book I wrote. One review of The True Con­fes­sions of Char­lotte Doyle indi­cat­ed that if I had worked hard­er I would have writ­ten a bet­ter book. True, I guess, in a way.

These days, with the inter­net and anony­mous reviews, and an open plat­form for any­one, one gets many (shall we say) curi­ous com­ments. I recall one review of City of Orphans. The crit­ic wrote that she thought it was going to be a dystopi­an nov­el, and when she real­ized it was not, wrote that it was, there­fore, a bad book.

Mind, I’ve got­ten vast­ly more pos­i­tive reviews than neg­a­tive ones. But as many a writer will tell you, you tend to remem­ber the unhap­py ones. (See above).

That said, when a neg­a­tive note is put for­ward by a good num­ber of read­ers, I’m inclined to think they are right.

When Rag­weed (Num­ber 1 in the Pop­py series) was first pub­lished (1999) it received very good reviews. Still, there was one per­sis­tent crit­i­cism: that there was an excess of slang.

Dur­ing the past year Harp­er Pub­lish­ing let me know they were going to reis­sue the series (in paper­back) with revised covers.

I made a bold request. Could I revise the text of Rag­weed? To my delight (and sur­prise) they said yes.

But, wait! Not so sim­ple. I did not have the text of the book in any par­tic­u­lar for­mat. Was it com­posed on a type­writer, or some kind of com­put­er disk? Cer­tain­ly it wasn’t on any hard drive.

I found a com­pa­ny that con­vert­ed print­ed text to dig­i­tal for­mat. They took a copy of the pub­lished book, and after a cou­ple of weeks sent me an e‑mail with the text attached. (Note to read­er: Not cheap!)

In any case, I now had the book on my com­put­er (or does one say in my com­put­er?). I set about my revi­sion, and that revi­sion focused almost exclu­sive­ly on that excess slang.

The revised Rag­weed has now been pub­lished. It also has a bet­ter cov­er, one that cap­tures a key aspect of the book, Clutch’s band, The Be-Flat Tires, per­form­ing at the Cheese Squeeze Club. Also, some of the art has a slight­ly revised lay­out: Thank you, as always, to my esteemed col­league, Bri­an Flo­ca.

Hav­ing lis­tened to my crit­ics, and act­ed upon their sug­ges­tion, is the book bet­ter? I think so. But I have no doubt I’ll hear one way or another.

Hap­py to lis­ten (and learn).

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.