Avi

word craft

blog

Inarticulate

keyboard
pho­to cred­it: Sasun1990 | 123rf.com

As I was work­ing today on a book, a mes­sage sud­den­ly popped up on my screen: 

“Did you know that you used more unique words than 85% of Gram­marly users?” 

First, I was star­tled by the appar­ent fact that Gram­marly was track­ing my words. Sec­ond­ly, I won­dered why they were track­ing my work. Third­ly, while I am aware that I have a large vocab­u­lary, and that I try to make my writ­ing var­ied, I make it a point — con­sid­er­ing my young read­ers — NOT to use obscure or exces­sive­ly com­plex lan­guage. In fact, I am a believ­er in sim­ple, straight­for­ward writ­ing to express the emo­tions about which I am writing.

On the same day, I read an arti­cle in the New York Times,An Ancient Solu­tion to Our Cur­rent Cri­sis of Dis­con­nec­tion.”

The arti­cle, by Mr. John Bowe, had this to say: 

“Han­nah Hob­son, a lec­tur­er in psy­chol­o­gy at the Uni­ver­si­ty of York [UK] who has stud­ied the con­nec­tions among lan­guage, com­mu­ni­ca­tion, and men­tal health … has found repeat­ed­ly that the inabil­i­ty to express feel­ings or ask for help can often cor­re­late with exist­ing or devel­op­ing men­tal health issues among youth. Con­verse­ly … improved com­mu­ni­ca­tion skills cor­re­late with young­sters’ emo­tion­al devel­op­ment and well-being.” 

Mr. Bowe is propos­ing the teach­ing of the (now) ancient teach­ing of rhetoric, which in its sim­plest form is the art of speak­ing and lis­ten­ing. When you con­sid­er the brevi­ty of e‑mail, the gen­er­al decline in read­ing, and that social media com­mu­ni­ca­tion is as slight in form as it is in con­tent, it is hard­ly a won­der that young peo­ple have not been taught how to com­mu­ni­cate their com­plex feel­ings and emotions.

One often hears the gen­er­al sense that young peo­ple, in par­tic­u­lar ado­les­cents, are very emo­tion­al. True enough. And yet, in our cur­rent soci­ety, their expe­ri­ence with how to express those emo­tions is at best lim­it­ed, cut off, and trun­cat­ed. That inabil­i­ty to com­mu­ni­cate appar­ent­ly can lead to men­tal issues. 

Monster Walter Dean Myers

A good num­ber of years ago I was asked to speak at a boy’s juve­nile deten­tion cen­ter in Vir­ginia. Slumped in their chairs, their body lan­guage telling me that they were forced to be there, the young men were polite, but clear­ly not par­tic­u­lar­ly inter­est­ed in what I had to say or me for that mat­ter. That is, not until it came out that Wal­ter Dean Myers was a good friend of mine. Then they lit­er­ar­i­ly sat up in the chairs and began to pep­per me with ques­tions about him. It appeared that many of these young pris­on­ers had read Mon­ster, and the book had artic­u­lat­ed their feel­ings, so that I, by virtue of my con­nec­tion with Wal­ter, was sud­den­ly giv­en a flood of words and ideas. It was star­tling and pow­er­ful evi­dence of what a book can mean to young people. 

I don’t want to sug­gest that read­ing is a cure for all the prob­lems of men­tal ill­ness in our coun­try. But I will say if peo­ple can­not be taught or expe­ri­ence how to express their feel­ings, frus­tra­tions, and con­flicts with words, they will find ways—destructive ways—to express their emotions. 

Social media is often (right­ly, I think) crit­i­cized for its mis­in­for­ma­tion, lack of real con­tent, and sim­plis­tic artic­u­la­tion, but per­haps its most pro­found prob­lem is that it is an inept way to communicate.

So, when I am told (by Gram­marly) that my writ­ing is full of unique words, Gram­marly is not so much prais­ing me, as reveal­ing that a large part of the pop­u­la­tion is inarticulate.

The moral: be wor­ried about the per­son who can­not speak or write their thoughts.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts