word craft


I’m Considered One of Those Writers

Read­ers often have favorite authors or gen­res, in part because those writ­ers or types of books pro­vide the same kind of read­ing sat­is­fac­tion in a reg­u­lar fash­ion. They will often return to the same author. Noth­ing wrong with that. By and large, you know what you will be get­ting if you pick up a Dr. Seuss book, or one by John Le Car­ré. Indeed, I know some­one (an adult) who end­less­ly reads and rereads the Har­ry Pot­ter books. 

But what of those writ­ers who write many dif­fer­ent kinds of books? 

As an occa­sion­al read­er of mys­tery books, I was intrigued when I recent­ly read an arti­cle in the New York Times, about a 1920’s detec­tive nov­el called The Red House Mys­tery that was being rec­om­mend­ed as a for­got­ten clas­sic. What attract­ed me to the book was the author, A.A. Milne. He was the guy who wrote the Win­nie-the-Pooh books. 

The Red House Mystery
A.A. Milne Shadowland Emil Otto Hoppe 1922

A.A. Milne, Shad­ow­land, Emil Otto Hop­pé, 1922 (pub­lic domain)

What was he doing writ­ing a mystery? 

I read the book. Turns out it is one of those “cozy” British 1920s mys­ter­ies set among upper-class folks (no known source of income) in a fan­cy house some­where in Eng­land, not far from Lon­don. It fea­tures an ama­teur detec­tive and his dumb side­kick, with a very elab­o­rate (and rather unbe­liev­able) mur­der decep­tion. It was fair­ly well writ­ten, but all-in-all not very interesting.

But why did Milne write such a book? 

It seems that Alan Alexan­der Milne (1882–1956) was a pro­lif­ic writer for the stage (eigh­teen of them) as well as screen­plays. He also wrote humor­ous pieces for the peri­od­i­cal Punch, as well as oth­er nov­els, and essays. Active in both world wars, he was also con­sid­ered a good crick­et play­er, and had a team called “Authors Eleven,” with a group of fel­low authors that includ­ed Bar­rie (Peter Pan), Conan Doyle (Sher­lock Holmes), and P.G. Wode­house (Jeeves), the squad sound­ing rather like a Mon­ty Python sketch. 

Milne has been quot­ed as say­ing “The only excuse which I have yet dis­cov­ered for writ­ing any­thing is that I want to write it.” 

It has also been not­ed that Milne came to resent the enor­mous fame and suc­cess that the Pooh books brought him, at the expense of the neglect of his oth­er work. That in the face of the claim that Milne and his wife exploit­ed their child Christo­pher Robin for the mon­ey the Pooh books brought it. 

But what inter­est­ed me here is the spec­tac­u­lar range of Milne’s writ­ing. How do read­ers respond to the writer of dif­fer­ent kinds of work? 

This caught me because I’m con­sid­ered one of those writ­ers. There is my True Con­fes­sions of Char­lotte Doyle (his­tor­i­cal fic­tion), The Pop­py Books (ani­mal sto­ries), The Most Impor­tant Thing (real­is­tic short sto­ries), School of the Dead (ghost sto­ry). And so on. 

Some­times read­ers com­plain that I am not writ­ing the kind of book they like, but anoth­er kind. I recall a Goodreads review by a read­er who picked up City of Orphans, think­ing it was a dystopi­an fan­ta­sy. Then, to her dis­ap­point­ment, she dis­cov­ered it was real­is­tic his­tor­i­cal fic­tion. “It was not what I expect­ed,” she wrote and there­fore gave it a very neg­a­tive review. 

At the moment I am try­ing to decide which of four ideas I wish to pur­sue as my next nov­el. Each one is very dif­fer­ent from the other. 

All I know is that if I fol­low Milne’s thought: “The only excuse which I have yet dis­cov­ered for writ­ing any­thing is that I want to write it,” I will write my best book.

So be it. 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts